Side-by-Side Comparison
Koodisi vs Make
Make (formerly Integromat) offers flexible visual automation for SMBs and mid-market. Koodisi delivers enterprise automation with governance, reusable components, and native API management that Make cannot match.
Koodisi
Make
Feature Comparison
ReusabilityReusable subflow component library — build a workflow once and reference it from multiple parent workflows. Reduces duplication and maintenance overhead.
ReusabilityScenarios are rebuilt per use case. Limited reusability forces teams to duplicate logic across automations.
GovernanceFull workspace RBAC. IT governs access and deployment; business teams operate within defined guardrails.
GovernanceBasic team permissions. No enterprise-grade workspace isolation or governance controls.
PricingFlat enterprise pricing — predictable regardless of operation volume.
PricingPer-operation pricing. High-volume automations result in escalating costs that are difficult to predict.
API ManagementNative API Manager included — publish, manage, and consume APIs within the platform.
API ManagementNo API management capabilities. API-first workflows require external tooling.
Dev LifecycleStructured Dev → Deploy → Test → Promote. Changes are tested safely before reaching production.
Dev LifecycleNo native staging or structured deployment pipeline. Scenarios go live immediately.
Verdict
Make is a capable tool for SMB and mid-market teams with straightforward automation needs. Koodisi is the better choice when enterprises need reusable workflows, governance, and API management.
Ship integrations faster. Operate them without chaos.
Reduce build time, eliminate blind spots, and keep every workflow accountable in production. Teams move faster — without losing control.
Contact Sales